Divesting not panacea for "Singapore Inc"
|
Reuters.
May 18, 2000 |
||
| SINGAPORE
will need more than divestment of the state's huge stakes in its leading
companies to alter prevailing views the firms are too government-influenced.
Analysts say managements,
heavy with executives who have served in government, reflect Singapore's
conservative approach to fiscal matters and decision-making and must also
see change. But quicker disposal
of Singapore's more than S$70 billion (US$40.4 billion) in holdings is
seen as an important first step that may also help spur some shifts in
management and attitude. "It can't hurt
Singapore Inc. to inject new ideas and new blood through strategic sales,"
said Lim Say Boon, director of OCBC Investment Research. 'Singapore Inc' is
a catch-phrase for the view Singapore is run much like a large corporation.
Shrinking the government
portfolio is no simple task. GLC (government-linked
company) holdings include controlling stakes in such giants as Singapore
Airlines (SIA) and Singapore Telecommunications (SingTel), and represent
25 percent of Singapore stockmarket capitalisation. "There is an urgency
to it, but their holdings are some S$70 billion. To divest that is difficult
to execute," said Lim Jit Soon, head of country research at Salomon
Smith Barney. GO PUBLIC, YOUNG
ECONOMY But in the wake of
the second rejection of a SingTel multi-billion dollar regional acquisition
bid in three months and rumblings about how much SIA should be able to
buy in foreign airlines, analysts say accelerated divestment is necessary,
however difficult. The move may help defuse
criticism such acquisitions offer Singapore influence over other countries'
internal affairs, as well as giving the city-state a more open economic
image. Other potential merits
to sales by the nation's investment arm, Temasek Holdings, include broader
shareholder profiles for companies and use as a springboard for strategic
equity tie-ups with cutting edge multinationals. "It may from time
to time be useful for corporations to be seen as Singaporean and not Singaporean
government," said Lim. Some analysts said
management changes should accompany any share sale, noting GLCs often reflect
the Singapore government's operating style -- conservatism and cash stockpiles.
"They're managed
like Singapore manages the economy," said Michael Leutwyler, managing
director of relative value adviser San Francisco Sentry. "Singapore is
sitting on at least S$100 billion in reserves, and you've got (billions)
in SingTel's hands...but they don't use it." Two blue chip GLCs,
DBS Holdings and Neptune Orient Lines (NOL), have brought in "foreign
talent," or managers, to lead their operations, but other firms' approach
is still seen as too much like the government. Singapore is known
for a careful and lengthy process of consultation and consensus in its
decision-making, in which leaks can result in serious consequences. Such standard operating
procedures may not be advantageous in the merger and acquisition world,
where using the media to counter criticism and quick decision-making can
be crucial. An article in Singapore's
own Straits Times newspaper suggested SingTel might have succeeded
in a bid for Malaysia's Time Engineering had it moved faster. GO QUIETLY INTO
THAT GOOD DEAL Since the demise of
SingTel's deal with Time last week, Singapore officials have been silent.
But in mid-April, more
than a month after a SingTel bid for Cable and Wireless HKT failed, Prime
Minister Goh Chok Tong said GLCs faced a perception problem, adding Singapore
may divest by putting holdings under unit trusts for public distribution.
Temasek has also recognised
that demand to divest is growing. In a letter to the
Straits Times newspaper on May 5, Wong Heng Tew, senior vice president
of Temasek, said Singapore constantly reviews whether to reduce its GLC
holdings. "While we agree
that times have changed and there are no compelling reasons for the government
to hold controlling stakes in the GLCs, we cannot divest our stakes...overnight,"
Wong said. Temasek listed 11 GLCs
it had divested partially or entirely from, including SingTel, SIA, NOL
and Keppel Corp. Temasek officials contacted
by Reuters declined to be interviewed, but Wong said value mattered when
considering sales. "We have to wait
for the right time to get the right price." Two candidates are rail
company Singapore MRT and port operator PSA Corp, which have announced
plans to go public. Lai Yeu Huan, JM Sassoon
investment analyst, said SMRT's initial public offering would likely see
pricing of nine times earnings, while PSA would at least see 15 to 20 times.
"It's the world's
best port and something Singapore is proud of," Lai said, noting recent
firm pricings for IPOs of SIA units. "All (GLCs) have
been very well-priced in that sense." |
||