| Amnesty International's report on Singapore | ||||
| Amnesty
International May 30, 2001 LONDON Covering events from January - December 2000 SINGAPORE
------------------------------------------------------------------------ FREEDOM of expression continued to be curbed by an array of restrictive legislation and by the effects of civil defamation suits against political opponents. At least 29 Jehovah's Witnesses were imprisoned during the year. Death sentences continued to be imposed and 21 people were executed. Criminal offenders, including juveniles, were sentenced to caning. Background : Restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly Although no new civil defamation suits were filed by government leaders, this practice continued to be misused to curb the right to freedom of expression and the right of political opponents to participate freely in public life. An array of restrictive legislation also remained in place, undermining the rights to freedom of expression and assembly. In May police refused to issue a permit for a public forum on homosexuality, claiming it would be contrary to the public interest. Under Singapore's Penal Code, homosexual acts between consenting adults may incur lengthy prison terms. In recent years the authorities have also denied a gay and lesbian support group permission to register under the Societies Act. In September, as part of an apparent attempt to encourage public debate on issues of national concern, the authorities allowed the creation of a new open-air forum, known as the ''Speakers' Corner''. Opposition leaders voiced their scepticism about the ''Speakers' Corner'', reiterating concerns that there could be no true freedom of speech without reform of restrictive laws such as the Internal Security Act, which allows for indefinite detention without trial. In December, police refused to issue a permit to the organizers of a marathon run to commemorate international human rights day. Civil defamation suits In December, in a separate case, a court awarded over S$66,000 (approximately US$38,000) to J.B. Jeyaretnam after ruling in his favour against a lawyer who had failed to pay costs previously awarded against him. Immediately following this, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and four others, including three PAP parliamentarians, applied to the courts to seize the S$66,000 awarded to J.B. Jeyaretnam on the grounds that a 1996 defamation award against the Central Council of the Workers' Party had not been paid in full. There were concerns that the timing of this application appeared designed to prevent J.B. Jeyaretnam from paying further instalments of damages in the Workers' Party newsletter case, thereby bankrupting him. Conscientious objectors Death penalty Cruel judicial punishment |
||||